|
|
http://www.rte.ie/news/2003/0224/colombia.html
Colombia seeks 6 ETA, IRA members - reports
February 24, 2003
(22:11) Colombian authorities are searching for six members of the Basque
separatist group ETA and the Irish Republican Army.
It is reported they are suspected of taking part in the bombing of the
upmarket El Nogal club in Bogotá two weeks ago that left 36 dead.
The attack, which also injured 160 people, was blamed on FARC rebels.
They have recently stepped up urban attacks and are increasingly targeting
the country's upper middle classes.
A former FARC member is said to have told investigators that the ETA and
IRA members entered Colombia along its 2,219 km border with Venezuela.
Investigators believe more than 150 kg of C4 explosive and ammonium nitrate
were used in the blast.
Police were investigating whether the bombing was planned with the help
of one of more of El Nogal's 400 employees.
1. Exclude them from our government & SinnFein/IRA help to massacre
115
people.
2. SinnFein/IRA are finished in the USA
3. SinnFein/IRA help to massacre another 21 people.
4. Testing weapons in the jungles of Colombia
5. FARC Soldier tells all
6. Summary of Investigation of IRA Links
to FARC Narco-Terrorists in Colombia
COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
U.S. House of Representatives
------------------------- -----------------------------
SinnFein/IRA help to massacre 115 people.
Another 115 people massacred, most of them women and children who were
seeking refuge in a church, and still Tony Blair and Bertie Ahern do
nothing. One now must start asking "WHY" when the world is united
in the
fight against terrorism these 2 idiots seem to support it. And as for
SinnFein/IRA and supporters they use the pathetic excuse that its nothing
to
do with them, its all been story manufactured by those in opposition to
the
GFA.
The time has come SinnFein/IRA MUST BE EXCLUDED FROM ANY ROLE IN GOVERNMENT,
IN ULSTER AND IN SOUTHERN IRELAND. The world has all the proof that it
needs
so Blair and Ahern must travel the same the road as the United States
Government, who are refusing visas and will designate SinnFein/IRA a
terrorist organization in October, resulting in them being banned from
even
entering the USA.
And of our Politicians, get out to the States, take Michelle Williamson
and
other victim's with you, let the people know what its really like here,
Ophra and other coast to coast shows will be glad to have you so what
are
you waiting for. Remember this Blair will only respond to massive world
and
public opinion, that means pressure from the US and others. Tell our story
what do we pay you to do? remember you work for us so get started or we
will
sack the lot of you.
For the moment the British and Irish governments are under no pressure
in
relation to Colombia. They can take shelter, with perfect propriety, behind
the sub judice rule: the men have to be considered innocent until they
have
been tried and convicted .But once the men are tried and convicted - the
two
Governments will no longer have the shelter of the sub judice rule. They
will be told by the US Government quietly at first and then if necessary
more strongly that an organisation proved to be hostile to the United
States
must not be countenanced by any Government friendly to the United States.
That means that Sinn Fein should not be accepted any longer by the two
Governments as a partner in the governance of Northern Ireland unless
Sinn
Fein publicly repudiates all connection with the IRA. And repudiation,
since
Sinn Fein exists primarily to serve the IRA, is extremely unlikely. Both
Governments will feel the pressure, but the pressure will fall primarily
on
the Government of the Republic. This has to be so because the criminals
concerned are Irish citizens and the IRA's arms are known to be stored
in
Ireland contrary to Irish law, but with the tacit consent of the Irish
Government, which has allowed the weapons to be inspected there.
The American Government has known all about that for years, and has been
content to turn a blind eye to it. But that was before it became known
that
Sinn Fein-IRA had been involved in secret military operations against
the
United States. A great line was crossed there, and the United States could
no longer tolerate collusion by the British and Irish Governments with
Sinn
Fein-IRA. But the prime pressure will fall on the Irish Government both
for
the reasons stated above and because the British Government, unlike the
Irish Government, is in military alliance with the United States.
Indeed it appears as Britain's most reliable military ally, and therefore
will not be subjected to much direct pressure. Ireland is not a military
ally, and therefore the primary pressure will fall on the Government of
Ireland. If the Government of Ireland calls for the expulsion of Sinn
Fein
at the behest of the United States, the Government of Great Britain is
certain not to object. So Bertie Ahern is going to feel the heat, once
the
trials in Colombia are over. Sinn Fein-IRA are well aware of the troubles
looming up for them and that is why they have been accumulating brownie
points, almost feverishly. Hence Sinn Fein's tribute to all the war dead,
and hence the IRA's apology to the innocent victims of its military
campaign.
Bertie Ahern will be in some difficulty, but hardly of an insuperable
kind.
There is some anti-Americanism around in Ireland, but mostly of a subliminal
deniable kind. And there is quite a lot of active sympathy with Sinn
Fein-IRA among rank-and-file Fianna Fail supporters. None the less, few
Fianna Fail people, and fewer still other Irish people, would look with
equanimity on a breach between Ireland and America - which would also
mean a
breach between the Irish in Ireland and people of Irish descent in America.
In these rather frustrating circumstances, Bertie Ahern, would give in
to
the Americans, but only after a mild show of recalcitrance. He would try
to
get Sinn Fein to repudiate the Colombian Three. Only after he tried and
failed - as he would fail - to get that repudiation, would he see to it
that
Sinn Fein was removed from the Executive of the Northern Ireland Assembly.
And this move would be likely to be supported by all members of the Dail,
with the exception of Sinn Fein, and possibly also the Greens.
--------------------------- ---------------------------
SinnFein/IRA are finished in the USA
In dealing with SinnFein/IRA, Clinton made clear that he wished to see
a
breakthrough on Ireland. However, he also repeatedly made clear that he
viewed his role as a good faith mediator, bringing all sides on board.
Ironically, having made such advances, Sinn Fein now accepted the
intervention of Kennedy and others, who had supported an SDLP or Dublin
agenda and condemned Irish Republicans. The imprimatur of such new allies
offered the benefit of increased financial contributions and increased
political influence but with strings very clearly attached. There allies
were not pro-Republican and any involvement would be tied to business,
ceasefires and ultimate transformation of Sinn Fein into an establishment
political party.Ultimately these influences would be part of the political
alliances, which made acceptance of Stormont inevitable.
Bush has no high regard for the Irish issue. He presides with a Reagan-type
cabinet style, where his Vice-President Dick Cheney, Secretary of State
Colin Powell and political allies such as James Baker do not merely
influence but control policy.
There is little expectation that Bush would personally invest substantial
time, commitment and prestige to Ireland. St. Patrick’s Day at the
White
House consisted of celebratory shamrocks and toasts, minus the behind
the
scenes presidential diplomacy and negotiation. A second sharp contrast
between the Clinton and Bush Administration is the expected return to
the
primacy of the State Department on Irish issues.
For decades the American State Department dominated American’s
foreign
policy on Ireland. The American State Department officials worked with
British counterparts on a wide range of international situations and crafted
what was hyped as a special relationship. Plainly speaking the special
relationship meant that America would defer to the British on Irish policy
in exchange for cooperation elsewhere.
Clinton took control of the policy from the State Department, and allocated
the area of responsibility to the National Security Council, as a first
step
in transforming American policy.
Now that step is being reversed by the Bush Administration. The State
Department headed by Colin Powell again sets Irish policy. It was the
State
Department, which set the pro-British policies of the Reagan-Bush years
to
the State Department signals a seismic shift back to that pro-British
perspective. This seismic shift was cemented by the appointment of senior
State Department official Richard Haass as an ambassador at large to
Ireland, and a ban on the Sovereignty Movement and Irish Republican
Prisoners Welfare Association.
In this context Bush Administration policy towards Ireland must be
considered The Bush Administration’s first priority will be British
interests. The Stormont deal and process is a safe issue, which may bring
some political credit without a significant effort or political risk.
From
the U.S. point of view the IRA’s alleged training of FARC is of
immediate
concern. Latin American narco-terrorists like FARC’s are believed
to be
responsible for some 90 percent of the cocaine and 70 percent of the heroin
sold in America. U.S. Southern Command has said that it "recognized
a viable
terrorist threat in Latin America long before Sept. 11," adding,
"If not
further exposed and removed, that threat poses a serious potential risk
to
our own national security as well as to our hemispheric neighbors."
SinnFein/IRA, one of the world’s most dangerous and successful terrorist
groups, has indeed trained FARC, that risk has multiplied exponentially.
Charges that such training has occurred must be investigated thoroughly
and
cannot be held to ransom because of a peace process that will be put at
far
greater risk by any failure to move against such cross-pollination among
terrorists. As such incidents show, the globalization of terrorism is
larger
than al Qaeda.
The Bush Administration may therefore be expected to look to the British,
and play down the Colombian arrests because it serves British interests
to
keep Sinn Fein inside the Stormont Deal process. However Bush sees that
American interests are being affected by a strong connection with FARC
and
he would have little hesitation in penalising Sinn Fein albeit within
limits
circumscribed by British interests. There are the calculations, which
will
dominate for better or worse, American policy and the Stormont Deal, under
a
Bush administration.
------------------------- -------------------------
SinnFein/IRA help to massacre another 21 people.
IRA-trained Colombian rebels were responsible for the mortar attacks
that
killed 21 people last week, security forces in the South American country
said last night. "There is no doubt that behind these attacks is
the
training of the IRA," said General Reynaldo Castellanos, a divisional
commander, in the capital Bogota. His statement reinforces the allegation
by
Gen Jorge Enrique Mora, head of the Colombian military. Rebels of the
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Farc) were blamed for the attacks
last Wednesday as President Alvaro Uribe took office. After the attack,
police found 16 remote controlled devices and more than 100 other mortars
ready to be launched in safe houses just over a mile from government
buildings.
They are awaiting trial in October accused of training Marxist guerrillas
in
the use of explosives and urban terrorism. Since February, the Farc forces
have taken their 38-year war from the countryside into the cities.Their
most
audacious urban operation yet was unleashed last Wednesday.They fired
mortars at the presidential palace just as the new president, an
Oxford-educated Right-winger, was being sworn in.Colombian and British
security experts said the Farc operation had all the hallmarks of the
IRA
and brought to mind the mortar fired at Downing Street in 1991. "It
seems to
be a classic IRA operation," said a former British army officer,
a bomb
disposal expert who specialised in IRA mortars.
"The first set of rounds was designed to distract the security forces,
focus
their attention far from the principal target." The first attack
involved
mortars fired in the north of the capital aimed at the Military Academy.
This drew in the security forces and focused attention from the main event
at the presidential palace. The operation was the first time in Colombia
that mortars had been set off by radio control, with sophisticated weapons
placed by urban militias acting with a new efficiency. "This may
be new for
the Colombians," said the British expert. "But these are elements
that we
have experienced for many years. "There are few terrorist organisations
that
have this level of mortar expertise. They are the IRA and, perhaps to
a
lesser extent, Eta." Jairo Parra, an explosives expert with the DAS,
Colombia's version of MI5, the quality of the mortars represented a
"technological leap" for the guerrillas.
-------------------------- ------------------------------
Testing weapons in the jungles of Colombia
The IRA has been testing weapons in the jungles of Colombia. Luis Camilo
Osorio said recent attacks by FARC guerrillas had employed techniques
similar to those used by the IRA. His comments have provoked anger among
supporters of three Irish republicans being held in the South American
country for the past year. Jim Monaghan, Martin McCauley and Niall Connolly
are awaiting trial accused of training Colombian Marxist guerrillas. In
an
exclusive interview with the BBC, Mr Osorio said he believed the IRA was
linked to the rebel group. "A recent attack in a town where 115 people
were
massacred, most of them women and children who were seeking refuge in
a
church, was carried out using these techniques - long distance mortars.
"These are techniques we are certain were taught by this group,"
he said.
"We are talking about a type of cylinder with explosives and we are
talking
about a type which consists of a series of oblong tubes where you put
rockets similar to those used by the IRA."
------------------------------ -------------------
FARC Soldier tells all
The prosecution is relying on four FARC defectors who say the Irishmen
visited the territory several times since 1998. Once, it is alleged, they
brought crates of missiles on a private plane. They are also said to have
trained FARC personnel in explosives. The witnesses will never appear
in
public because, as FARC defectors, their lives are at risk. Their identities
are being concealed by a witness protection plan. But we managed to track
down another FARC deserter. We drove to a farm in the countryside to meet
him. 'Julio' was very nervous. He was a foot soldier in FARC for six years.
He does not intend to complicate his life by taking the stand. But he
spoke
to us because he believes that FARC has killed many innocent people. 'For
me, this is injustice.' He alleged that last summer three foreigners came
to the demilitarised zone to give instruction in military ideology and
explosives. Julio did both courses over about a month. The foreigners
came
from Ireland.
He pointed to a picture of James Monaghan, 'the grey-haired one', who,
he
alleged, had been the tutor on explosives. Niall Connolly, 'the bearded
one', had lectured in revolutionary politics. He had seen Martin McCauley
in the distance but had personally had nothing to do with him. The Irishmen
mingled with the FARC leaders, but were 'very cold' and 'psychologically
distant' towards the lesser ranks. 'They do not value one's life,' he
said.
The soldiers were taught advanced explosive techniques, working with
ammonium nitrate, black and white gunpowder and super-amphor. 'These four
chemicals are essential for a lethal explosion,' he said.
The guerrillas' leaders were impressed, he alleged, because the foreigners
showed them how to make the most of widely available resources. Monaghan
showed them how to mix the fertiliser with black gunpowder in a combination
that makes the blast 'more powerful than any usual explosion'. The courses
also involved remote-control detonators. He cited an attack last April,
detonated by remote control . It had a known IRA signature, a secondary
device. 'It had the capacity to destroy five or six blocks. I was
astonished.' Niall Connolly's course consisted of lectures in revolutionary
ideology. He frequently quoted Che Guevara and 'Bolívar's ideology
and how
we should behave regarding the masses'. He explained: 'The idea is to
get
the peasants engaged on our side. If a large number of peasants take our
side, we will come to power effortlessly.'
In San Vicente, the capital of the former FARC safe haven, Colonel de
la
Cruz, the commanding officer at the local military base, alleged the FARC
leaders had driven the Irishmen around the region in stolen four-wheel
drives. He claimed the Irishmen had given explosives training at FARC
bases
in Los Pozos, La Sombra and La Macerena and produced aerial photographs.
Connolly had been in Colombia at least once before. In April 2001 he led
a
mission there, again on a false document. Stamps on the false passport
in
the name of David Bracken seized by the Colombians showed he was widely
travelled in other Latin American countries.
In 1998, with Monaghan, he entered Nicaragua. In Managua we met a former
Sandinista fighter who spoke to us on condition of anonymity. He said
Connolly had a 'big reputation' in revolutionary circles and had attended
Sandinista conferences. He believed Connolly was a staff officer at an
elite training school in Cuba which ran clandestine courses for overseas
revolutionaries beneath a military base at Cienfuegos. Connolly gave
training in explosives techniques and military intelligence.
------------------- -----------------------------
Summary of Investigation of IRA Links
to FARC Narco-Terrorists in Colombia
COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
U.S. House of Representatives
On August 11, 2001, two members of the Irish Republican Army (IRA), along
with a representative of Sinn Fein, the IRA’s political wing, who
was known
to be stationed in Cuba and reportedly on the payroll of the Cuban Communist
Party, were arrested by Colombian authorities at the El Dorado airport
in
Bogota after leaving territory in southern Colombia controlled by the
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), a designated foreign
terrorist organization. The three men were carrying false identification
documents (passports) and were found to have traces of explosives on their
clothing and on items in their luggage. Two of the Irish nationals were
the
IRA’s leading explosives engineer and a mortar expert.
The Irish nationals were first detained by Colombian authorities and
were
initially charged by the Fiscalia, the Colombian prosecutor’s office,
for
using false travel documents. The three claimed they were in Colombia
to
monitor ongoing peace efforts in that country between the government of
President Andreas Pastrana and various rebel groups. The three were later
formally indicted by the Fiscalia in February, 2002 and charged with
training FARC terrorists in explosives and using false passports to cover
their true identities while in Colombia.
In addition to having positive forensic trace evidence of explosives
on
their belongings, the three Irish nationals have been identified by a
FARC
defector who surrendered to the Fiscalia in 2001. This individual reportedly
identified photographs of three Irish nationals as the same individuals
from
whom he received explosives training in the FARC safe haven. Committee
investigators are aware of additional corroborating witnesses in addition
to
this FARC defector, and as a result, Colombian authorities believe they
have
developed a strong criminal case against the three Irish nationals.
The initial case against the Irish nationals was developed by Colombian
military intelligence, and both the U.S. and the British embassies in
Bogota
responded to inquiries from Colombian authorities regarding the three
after
their arrest on August 11. Because two of the three were traveling on
falsified British passports, the first information about the arrests was
received by the British embassy in Bogota when a weekend duty officer
received a call from Colombian authorities. The initial British response
to
the arrests was to conduct routine consular work and to request assistance
from the U.S. embassy in Bogota.
The obvious question, of course, is that if the IRA were legitimately
concerned with the peace process in Colombia, why would the detained Irish
nationals have needed false passports to conceal their identities, and
why
would the IRA have sent experts in explosives? Following the arrest of
the
Irish nationals, the Colombian government, in fact, changed its procedure
for entry of foreigners into the FARC safe haven, requiring a license
from
its peace envoy, until the demilitarized zone (DMZ) was finally closed
on
February 20, 2002.
The claim by the three Irish nationals that their activities in the DMZ
were
related to the peace process does not appear to be supported by the facts.
The Colombian government, which organized and tracked mediation efforts
by
outside groups and individuals including numerous Europeans, did not know
of
the three’s activities in the FARC safe haven.
Committee investigators interviewed ambassadors representing the group
of
ten nations working in support of the Colombian government’s peace
process
with the FARC. These diplomats were in the FARC safe haven in Colombia
at
the very same time in July/August, 2001 that the three Irish nationals
were
in the DMZ. None of these diplomats recognized these Irishmen by name
or by
the photos that committee investigators showed them, nor had they been
aware
of any FARC links to the Irish or the Irish peace process. Additionally,
they said the FARC leadership with whom they met to discuss the peace
process never mentioned the Irish peace process or these Irish nationals.
However, a senior Latin American diplomat interviewed said he was not
surprised that the IRA may have been brought in to train FARC in urban
warfare techniques to counter the $1.3 billion in U.S. counter-drug
assistance, including helicopters, provided to Colombia beginning in FY
2000.
Events in Colombia make it clear that global terrorist networks are
interchangeable, aggressive, and know no boundaries or borders, threatening
anyone and any nation. The situation in Colombia illustrates the growing
phenomenon of proceeds from illicit drugs playing a major role in financing
the activities of global terrorist networks. The FARC is believed by
knowledgeable Colombians to take in as much as $2 million a day in illicit
drug proceeds. British sources suggest, although there is no hard evidence,
that the IRA may have received as much as $2 million for the explosives
training they provided to the FARC. There also may be some ideological
alliances, as some in Colombia believe. There is no evidence of any payment
in drugs by the FARC for the IRA training.
Colombian authorities believe that at least five and as many as 15 IRA
individuals have been traveling in and out of Colombia since at least
1998.
According to Colombian authorities, the arrests in August, 2001 are merely
the first publicly-exposed IRA activity in Colombia. However, more alarming
than the number of IRA-related individuals who have visited Colombia is
the
stature of some of these individuals who Colombian authorities identified
as
senior IRA explosive experts and technicians.
Colombia produces 90 percent of the cocaine and at least 70 percent of
the
heroin sold in the United States. Largely because of this serious drug
threat, the U.S. has a significant presence in that country to assist
the
Colombian authorities in fighting that threat.
The FARC is formally designated as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO)
by
the U.S. Department of State. It is thought to be "the most dangerous
international terrorist group based in this hemisphere," according
to a
State Department official. The FARC narco-terrorists openly target American
civilians in Colombia, kidnaping and killing them. U.S. federal indictments
were issued on March 18, 2002 against several FARC leaders based on evidence
of conspiracy to traffic drugs to the United States.
Improvements in the FARC’s ability to carry out terrorist bombings
which
Colombian authorities link to the IRA’s activity directly impact
our
national interests in Colombia. The country is already the third largest
recipient of U.S. aid, and of particular concern is the large American
presence (DEA, special forces, contractors, embassy personnel, etc.) related
to drug-fighting efforts in Colombia. Hundreds of temporary duty personnel
(TDY) are in Colombia on any given day. As American assistance increases
and
the U.S. enlarges its direct counter-terrorism role against the FARC,
more
Americans could be at risk from the IRA terrorist training of the FARC
identified by Colombian authorities.
In light of the long history of very strict IRA discipline against
freelancing by its membership, the only real question remaining in the
committee’s inquiry concerns what the Sinn Fein leadership (IRA’s
political
wing) knew about these IRA activities in Colombia, and when did they learn
of them. These were the questions posed in Chairman Henry Hyde’s
March 13th
invitation letter to Gerry Adams, president of Sinn Fein. In a brief
meeting, a senior Sinn Fein leader was adamant about the group’s
lack of
knowledge of these events in Colombia. Only time and history can ultimately
judge this response. However, since the congressional staff’s most
recent
return from Colombia, the IRA has suggested an answer to the questions
in
its April 8th statement on its much welcomed and constructive second arms
decommissioning: "...the IRA is a highly disciplined and committed
organization...we are relying on the discipline and commitment of our
support base and volunteers."
Some apparently would hope this matter would disappear so as to not impede
shared governance in Northern Ireland. The United States does not have
the
luxury of turning a blind eye when American lives and national interests
are
put at risk by IRA activity in Colombia. Colombian authorities believe
that
the rapidly escalating casualties they have suffered from terrorist attacks
since the FARC safe haven was ended in early 2002 are in substantial measure
attributable to these IRA training activities.
HIRC Investigation
At the request of a bipartisan group of members, the committee’s
investigative staff has conducted an extensive nine-month inquiry,
interviewing Colombian officials, advisors, and police. Committee
investigators also conducted inquiries in Cuba, Mexico, the United Kingdom,
Ireland (including Northern Ireland), and the United States. In the wake
of
the August arrests of the three Irish nationals, Investigative Counsel
John
Mackey has conducted dozens of interviews, met with numerous experts from
law enforcement and intelligence services here and abroad, and reviewed
documents and materials. Absent the excellent work of Colombian military
intelligence leading to the arrests of the three Irish nationals in August,
2001 and their excellent follow-up along with that of the Colombian police
and the Fiscalia, the IRA activity in Colombia would likely have continued
unnoticed, indefinitely.
Conclusions:
The IRA has had well-established links with the FARC narco-terrorists
in
Colombia since at least 1998. More Irish nationals than just the three
arrested in Colombia in August, 2001 may have been involved in visiting
Colombia for possible terrorist activities. It appears they have been
training in the FARC safe haven in explosives management, including mortar
and possibly car-bomb urban terrorist techniques, and possibly using the
rural jungles of the safe haven as a location to test and improve the
IRA’s
own terrorist weapons and techniques.
Explosives management training for the FARC by the IRA, and possibly
by
other foreign-based terrorists suspected by the Colombians, such as Cubans,
Iranians, ETA (the Spanish Basque terrorist group), among others, has
markedly improved the FARC’s proficiency in urban terrorism in the
last few
years. ETA has had past relations with the IRA, is active in both Cuba
and
Colombia, and may provide the link which brought the FARC and IRA together.
(Note: The Sinn Fein representative arrested August, 2001 in Colombia
was
Cuban-based and Spanish-speaking.)
New techniques in urban terrorism are being employed by the FARC in car
bombings which target police explosives teams and other first-responders
whose job is to dismantle or neutralize these deadly devices. (The police
have lost more than 10 percent of their bomb technicians to bombings in
the
last 12 months.) This is a typical IRA method of operation. The use of
mobile mortars on trucks and pickups, which the FARC is getting increasingly
effective at using, is also strikingly similar to known IRA explosive
techniques and practices. Neither committee investigators nor the Colombians
can find credible explanations for the increased, more sophisticated
capacity for these specific terror tactics now being employed by the FARC,
other than IRA training.
IRA training is now having a severe and adverse impact on Colombian life.
Apparently IRA explosives management training techniques are resulting
in
more effective explosives attacks against the Colombian urban infrastructure
including bridges, power lines, reservoirs, and other facilities. The
training provided by the IRA and exposed by the arrests last summer has
been
followed by numerous bombings and other terrorist attacks. The military
and
police casualties mount daily, weakening Colombian democracy further.
One
police Colonel from Narino Department (a FARC stronghold) told us of an
unprecedented loss of three police bomb technicians and 19 police officers
who were killed by FARC mortars in just the last 18 months alone.
Colombian authorities assert that not only has the IRA operated in the
former safe haven on behalf of the FARC, but also the Iranians, Cubans,
and
possibly ETA (Basque terrorists), among others. Colombia is a potential
breeding ground for international terror equaled perhaps only by
Afghanistan, and the IRA findings are the strongest among these global
links
because of the arrests of the three Irish nationals and the accompanying
evidence. It is likely that in the former FARC safe haven, all of these
terrorist groups had been sharing techniques, honing their terrorism skills,
using illicit drug proceeds in payment and collectively helping to challenge
the rule of law in Colombia, the oldest democracy in South America.
Recommendation
As the forces of global terrorism, illicit drugs, and organized crime
converge upon Colombia to produce new challenges to the international
system, the United States must reassess its current policy permitting
military assistance provided under Plan Colombia to be used exclusively
for
counter-narcotics programs. The threat of drug-financed terrorism and
organized crime of a global reach, illustrated by developments in Colombia,
must be addressed by changes in U.S. law that will permit American
assistance for counter-terrorism programs.
--------------------------- -------------------------
Bye all, Keep Safe, Tim, UPMJ.
Contact editor@u...
Or you can write to us at,
PO Box 122 Enterprise Way,
Mallusk Road,
Newtownabby
Northern Ireland,
BT36 4HQ
IRA/Cuban/Venezuelan Involvement in Colombia
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/8/19/211055.shtml
Robert Villa
Monday, Aug. 20, 2001 BOGOTA, Colombia – On Saturday, Aug. 18, orders
for the capture of 40 foreigners with criminal and terrorist records who
have entered Colombia were issued by the attorney general's office. While
the names were not released, the countries of origin were announced to
be Cambodia, China, Croatia, Cuba, El Salvador, Germany, Holland, Ireland,
Israel, Jordan, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Russia, Spain, Turkey, Ukraine and
Yugoslavia.
In the past week, the involvement of urban terrorism experts from the
Irish Republican Army (IRA) and various Cuban and Venezuelan military
operatives specializing in artillery and anti-air operations has alarmed
Colombia's military. Rumors of involvement of the Basque independence
guerrilla group, ETA, have also surfaced but have yet to be confirmed.
Despite repeated concerns regarding the true commitment of both Cuba
and Venezuela to the peace process, the current president of Colombia,
Andres Pastrana, has been die-hard on involving both groups in negotiations,
due to their ideological closeness to the guerrillas.
The President’s Peace Commission even planned for the eventual
participation of a contingent of Cuban soldiers that would be members
of a U.N. verification team in northern Colombia. The team would have
been responsible for verifying the good conduct of the guerrillas in a
distension zone controlled by the Ejercito de Liberacion Nacional (ELN).
Negotiations with the ELN failed last week, however, due to the government's
failure to produce a timeline acceptable to the guerrillas.
A U.N. verification team was never created for the present distension
zone already occupied by the Frente Armada Revolucionaria de Colombia
(FARC). That zone, created in 1999, has since become the national headquarters
for FARC training, kidnapping, coca growing and military operations.
Formerly, the United Nations and the European Union both had given their
support to the creation of the zone, putting aside concerns about illicit
activities, but in the past month and a half, a U.N. vehicle has been
stopped by the FARC and a member of a U.N. team kidnapped, three Germans
have been kidnapped and held in the zone, and many U.N. and E.U. diplomatic
missions are making plans to leave. Denmark has already closed up shop.
The appearance of foreign insurgents in Colombia is nothing new. Since
the 1948 creation of the Organization of American States, which occurred
in Bogota, foreigners have been attempting to overthrow the Colombian
government, long a strong ally of the United States. On April 9, 1948,
a popular Liberal Party leader was assassinated just as the OAS's first
meeting to organize was being convened. The result was massive rioting
that shook Bogota for several days, leaving nearly 5,000 dead.
The leaders of the FARC, which traces its origins back to this time,
have always lamented that they did not take advantage of the opportunity
presented by the rioting, known as the Bogotazo. A young Fidel Castro
took part in the rioting. At the time he was supposedly affiliated with
a group of Peronistas who were participating in a youth conference.
No one knows for sure who pulled the trigger in the assassination, but
speculation has long centered around Soviet involvement because the U.S.S.R.
feared that the OAS would create an unshakeable sphere of U.S. influence
in the Americas.
Cubans have been involved in Colombia since the 1960s, when a group of
leftist students, professors and priests took to the mountains, following
the foco theory of Fidel Castro, Ernesto "Che" Guevara and the
other proponents of the Cuban revolution. The foco theory insisted that
a Communist revolution could be inspired by taking to the mountains, instructing
the natives on the importance of overthrowing the regime, and then coming
down from the mountains to take the cities.
The ELN dates from this epoch, and while the great majority of the young
idealists who founded the ELN were killed in Colombia as they were in
other Latin American countries where the foco theory was attempted, Cuban
aid long sustained the organization.
Based in northern Colombia, Cuba has lately been involved in the peace
process, which had continued unabated until last week in Caracas, Venezuela,
under the watchful supervision of Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez.
Those talks were broken off last week, however, and in the past few days
the ELN has launched a series of attacks crossing through Venezuelan territory
to attack Colombian border posts.
General Fernando Tapias, commander of Colombia's armed forces, stated
that "the objective of the FARC is to strengthen its war against
the cities, and they know that they need to learn new strategies and technology."
Their "urban offensive," declared last month, was inaugurated
with an attack on several of the government's maximum security prisons.
The FARC stated that if the government refused a prisoner exchange as
part of the peace negotiations, the guerrillas would simply seize the
prisons.
There is little question that the FARC has the funds available to pay
for international aid in training its soldiers. The Colombian attorney
general's office placed the guerrillas' income for the year 2000 at between
$500 and $700 million. One military official stated that "they have
the money and drugs sufficient to pay for the most sophisticated weapons,
training and the highest technology in the world for communications and
terrorism."
Three IRA explosives experts were detected leaving from three distinct
points in Europe by European intelligence, and were followed closely by
Colombian officials until they attempted to leave the country, whereupon
they were apprehended. The Colombian police have reviewed their records
and found that the same three IRA operatives have repeatedly entered the
country since 1991.
The incident has sparked unrest in the United Kingdom as well as in Colombia,
due to concerns that the IRA is taking payments in arms or drugs. The
IRA has resisted the last few British proposals for disarmament.
Colombia's police in charge of immigration have now raised earlier estimates
of at least 20 Cuban military experts to close to 30. This development
is also disturbing, due to the supposed commitment of Cuba to the Colombian
peace process. Working together with these Cubans are "at least 10"
Venezuelan ex-military personnel.
Artillery experts from the two countries are probably training the guerrillas
in the creation of new rocket attack methods. For the last 20 years, the
FARC and ELN have both used a homemade gas canister rocket that, due to
its inaccuracy, has wreaked more havoc on civilians than on military bases.
Anti-aircraft missile experts from Cuba and Venezuela are probably working
on the seven anti-aircraft missile bases that have been detected under
construction in the distension zone. Armaments tracking detected the arrival
of Stinger and Redeye anti-aircraft missiles from Syria several years
ago. More shipments of anti-aircraft missiles and launchers have probably
been made by the Russian mafia, closely linked to the FARC because of
its unique ability to pay in highly lucrative cocaine, which Russia distributes
throughout Europe.
A partially completed submarine was discovered last year in central Colombia.
The small but highly sophisticated sub was designed to transport drug
shipments. The engineering plans were in Russian.
The final destination of the IRA terrorists is still uncertain. Within
five days the Colombian attorney general's office should determine whether
they will be tried in Colombia or deported. The Bush administration has
still made no comment on the case, other than to say that it supports
the Pastrana administration's continuing efforts for peace and that it
will be watching how the case progresses.
Cuba, for its part, is denying the presence of Cuban troops. Cuban chancellor
Aymee Hernandez said in Havana, "It’s a great fallacy, the
whole world knows that there are no Cubans there [in Colombia]."
Telegraph
Shining Path back as Farc exports terror
(Filed: 13/09/2003)
Flush with drug money, rebels linked to IRA are stretching their tentacles
across South America, reports Jeremy McDermott in Lima
Carlos agreed to meet in a hotel in central Lima. There was no question
of a real name or any photographs.
"Carlos" joined the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia,
or Farc, Colombia's Marxist rebels, more than 16 years ago and served
four years on the front lines. Now he has moved to the Peruvian capital,
but he is anything but retired.
Instead he is working clandestinely in Peru, as Farc builds up a support
base and establishes relations with the remnants of its brutal Peruvian
cousin, the Shining Path.
"We have now recruited 1,200 former members of the Shining Path to
our organisation, led by a Peruvian woman known as The Czech," Carlos
said.
The 17,000-strong Farc, the richest insurgent group in the world, flush
with money from the drugs trade and kidnapping, is now looking to stretch
its tentacles across South America.
It is thought to be not the first time Farc has had dealings with other
terrorist groups.
Three alleged IRA members are awaiting verdicts on charges of training
Farc in the use of explosives and urban terrorism, and security forces
have long noted close similarities between Colombian rebel car bombs and
those of the Basque separatist group Eta.
At its peak the Shining Path had 10,000 guerrillas under arms, controlled
large areas of Peru and threatened to defeat the government.
But with its feared leader, Abimael Guzman, captured 11 years ago with
most of the organisation's leaders, those elements still fighting have
become little more than armed gangs, without direction or money.
Guzman is being held in Callao, a maximum-security prison on the Peruvian
coast outside Lima.
In recent years the 500-odd remaining fighters he once led have been limited
to the odd ambush on police patrols in remote highland areas, frequently
without causing casualties. But that is changing.
"They have no ideology, these remnants of the Shining Path,"
said Col Benedicto Jimenez of the anti-terrorist police which captured
Guzman. "But that does not mean they are not a threat."
There are growing signs that the Shining Path is no longer a spent force,
but has acquired a new source of money and a new direction.
Three months ago, in an action all too common in Colombia but unprecedented
in Peru, a Shining Path column kidnapped 71 workers employed by an Argentine
company, Techint, that is building an oil pipeline in Peru. The hostages
were released unharmed after the guerrillas had relieved them of weapons,
dynamite and supplies, and amid rumours of a £125,000 ransom.
Techint admitted that there had been negotiations but insisted that no
ransom had been delivered. In Colombia there is one kidnapping registered
every four hours, most by the guerrillas who are estimated to earn more
than £80 million a year from the trade.
A month after the Techint kidnapping, seven Peruvian security personnel
were killed and 10 wounded in a well-planned attack on a military patrol
in the rugged highlands of Huanta, central Peru.
It was the Shining Path's most successful operation in years, but Carlos
insisted that Farc was not responsible.
"At the moment the work and the organisation is mainly political,
not military," he said. "The people here know we are not a terrorist
group as the gringos [Americans] like to portray us.
"There is a core group of 20 members of the Bolivarian Movement [Farc's
political wing) working here," he added. "We also have cells
in Argentina, Venezuela, Ecuador, Chile and Bolivia." He insisted
that their activities were political, not military.
At the same time as the Colombian rebels spread across the border, so
do drugs. In Colombia, most of Farc's £300 million-a-year income
comes from taxing the drugs trade.
But an unprecedented eradication campaign has been mounted by America,
involving spraying glyphosate chemicals, a relative of the Agent Orange
defoliant used in Vietnam, over the vulnerable Amazon basin.
Fleeing the defoliant campaign, Farc is seeking to secure a cut from the
growing drug cultivation in Peru, and has established 5,000 acres of coca
plantations of its own along the border between the two countries.
"It is difficult to say how quickly drug cultivation is growing,"
said Patrice Vandenberghe of the United Nations office on drugs and crime
in Lima. "But it is certainly increasing, both coca [the raw material
for cocaine] and poppy [used to make heroin]. More than ever before we
are seeing drug processing laboratories in Peru."
It is no coincidence that the remnants of Shining Path have more money
than before. In another new parallel with Farc's modus operandi, they
have taken to paying for food and supplies where once they simply stole
them at gunpoint.
"They are shifting tactics," said Educardo Toche of the Peruvian
think tank Desco. "They are now paying for food and giving political
lectures to communities where before they used only terror."
President Alejandro Toledo of Peru, with an approval rating languishing
at around 12 per cent, is concentrating all his efforts on simply clinging
to power.
The Peruvian defence ministry declined interview requests to discuss the
resurgence of the Shining Path or contacts with Farc. But a senior army
officer agreed to meet on condition of complete anonymity.
"I believe these allegations of Farc involvement in Peru. I have
seen enough evidence to support this," he said. "But the security
forces have their heads buried in the sand, and there is not the political
will to face the new insurgent threat."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/09/13/wfarc13.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/09/13/ixworld.html
This article lines out the effects of the IRA world wide terrorism network.
June 5, 2002 Printer-Friendly Version
http://www.cdi.org/terrorism/farc-ira.cfm
Underlying recent allegations of collusion between the Revolutionary Armed
Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA)
is the oft-neglected fact that al Qaeda is not the only international
terrorist network. Long before Osama bin Laden’s Islamic organization
achieved notoriety through its attacks in America on Sept. 11, 2001, other
terrorist groups established operational bonds with their counterparts
and sponsors across the world. Such collaboration flourished in the 1990s,
and members of the international terrorism community are believed to have
trained in many countries, often — but not always — with local
government approval. The list of countries in which such training has
occurred includes: Afghanistan; Bosnia-Herzegovina; Chile; Colombia; Iran;
Iraq; Lebanon; Libya; Mexico; North Korea; Pakistan; Peru; Russia; South
Africa; Sudan; Syria; and Turkey.
As this indicates, reports that foreign terrorists have been operating
within Colombia are neither entirely new nor particularly surprising.
Colombian groups such as FARC have long been known to contract military
experts and terrorists from overseas, with European terrorist organizations
reported to have often brokered such deals. The Red Army Faction is believed
to have been especially active in such activities, using mostly Middle
Eastern contracted trainers. Former British, Israeli, and U.S. military
personnel are also reputed to have been involved in such training in the
past. According to Gen. Fernando Tapias, chairman of the Columbian Joint
Chiefs of Staff, nationals from Iran, Iraq, Nicaragua, Ecuador, El Salvador,
Venezuela, Israel and Germany have been identified by FARC informants
and deserters as carrying out recent training for the Columbian terrorist
group.
Such statements tally with that made in March by the acting commander
in chief of U.S. Southern Command, Maj. Gen. Gary D. Speer, who stated
that links existed between Latin America and transnational terrorist organizations
including the IRA, Hezbullah, Hamas, Islamyya al Gama’at (IG), and
the Basque Fatherland and Liberty (ETA). Speer also said that Southern
Command had long been monitoring terrorist activities in the region, including
such incidents as the bombing of the Israeli Embassy in 1992 and the Jewish-Argentine
Cultural Center in Argentina in 1994 (attributed to Hezbullah), the capture
of the Japanese ambassador’s residence in Peru by the Tupac Amaru
Revolutionary Movements (MRTA) in 1996, and the pattern of narco-terrorism
in Colombia generally. However, The IRA training of FARC members represents
an alarming development, not least as the Irish group is widely held to
be among the most proficient practitioners of terrorism in the world.
Moreover, if claims that such training has occurred are believed, it may
cost the IRA heavily in terms of the support it has traditionally enjoyed
in the United States, and lead to the organization being viewed as having
a global reach.
Allegations of a FARC-IRA connection arose after the arrest of three
Irishmen in Bogotá in August 11, 2001. The men, James Monaghan,
Martin McCauley, and Neil Connolly, were traveling using false passports,
and found to have traces of explosive on their belongings. All three were
subsequently charged with training FARC members in the use of explosives.
Security sources in both the United Kingdom and the Irish Republic say
the men are IRA members. Monaghan is believed to have designed the IRA
homemade mortar. Originally developed with Libyan help in the early 1970s,
the primitive Mark I prototype has evolved into the much more sophisticated
Mark 18 "barracks buster," named for its effectiveness in targeting
security force bases in Northern Ireland. Monaghan’s skill in making
this weapon has earned him the nickname "Mortar Monaghan." Similarly,
MaCauley and Connolly are reported to be among the IRA’s best explosive
experts.
Connolly is believed to have initiated contact with FARC through the
Spanish terrorist group ETA five years ago, and known to be the official
representative in Cuba of the Sinn Fein, IRA’s political wing. The
appointment was initially denied but later admitted by the party. Sinn
Fein’s President Gerry Adams claimed that Connolly was appointed
without his knowledge or that of the international department of Sinn
Fein, while confirming that "one of our [Sinn Fein’s] senior
members asked Niall Connolly to represent the party in Cuba." When
asked by Columbian authorities, Monaghan, MaCauley, and Connelly had initially
insisted that they were in FARC’s semi-autonomous safe-haven as
eco-tourists, but later claimed to be in Columbia to view the peace process
and exchange experiences on this and the one in Northern Ireland.
Adams denied that any training had taken place and refused to attend
an April hearing into any FARC-IRA connection, saying he did not want
to prejudice the trial of the three captive Irishmen. U.S. Rep. Henry
Hyde (R-Ill.), chairman of the House International Relations Committee,
said at the hearing that there had been a "quantum leap in the FARC’s
terrorist proficiency on the ground and in urban warfare, which the Columbian
authorities believe is attributable to IRA training." This improvement
in FARC’s capabilities is apparent from the huge expansion in attacks
in the past 18 months that has left 400 Columbian Army and police personnel
dead. The attacks saw a shift to economic and urban targets as well as
the increased use of car bombs — a development that has caused the
death of 10 percent of the country’s bomb disposal experts since
January. Columbian forces have also been increasingly targeted by ‘secondary
devices’ — explosive devices used to ambush anyone responding
to other, more apparent bomb threats. Longer range mobile mortars such
as those pioneered by Monaghan have also recently become a new weapon
in the FARC arsenal. Such strategy, tactics, and equipment bear remarkable
similarities to those used by the IRA, greatly heightening the suspicion
that Monaghan, McCauley, and Connolly were in Columbia for reasons other
than eco-tourism or an exchange of experience on peace negotiations. Moreover,
indications that the IRA retains international links with other terrorist
groups do not stop in Columbia.
There have also been reported links between the Irish terrorists and
their Palestinian counterparts. According to a former British Army bomb
disposal expert with extensive Northern Ireland experience, the improvised
explosive devices recently diffused by him in the Jenin refugee camp are
identical to those he had only previously seen used by the IRA. Paul Collinson,
who now works for the Red Cross, says the Palestinian devices were also
placed using IRA-style tactics he had seen used in Armagh, Londonderry,
and Belfast. Collinson, who has worked on bomb disposal in the Palestinian
territories, as well as in Afghanistan, Columbia, and Egypt, says this
is the first time he has seen IRA weaponry and tactics used outside of
Northern Ireland. Links between the IRA and Palestinian groups is not
a new concern for Israel. The Irish group is known to have established
contacts with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in the
1970s, as well as meeting with other such groups in Libya in the 1980s.
Moreover, according to reports as recent as last month, the Mossad, the
Israeli intelligence service, has asked British security services to check
on movements of IRA operatives in an attempt to identify a sniper who
killed three civilians and seven soldiers in 25 minutes.
Sinn Fein denies that the IRA has trained FARC, as does the Irish terrorist
organization itself, claiming that the whole episode has been fabricated
by those who wish to derail the peace process in Northern Ireland. Such
an argument, while not implausible, fails to explain why Monaghan, McCauley,
and Connolly used aliases and traveled with false passports. Such subterfuge
appears unnecessary were the men there to engage in talks on a peace process.
Moreover, dispatching three known explosives experts on such a mission
rather than Sinn Fein politicians who are skilled in peace negotiations
seems a rather curious course of action, albeit somewhat less bizarre
than the notion that the three men should be engaged in eco-tourism in
the heart of FARC country. For the Columbian authorities to muddy the
contentious issue of their receiving U.S. aid for their war against terrorism
by raising the emotive issue of a FARC-IRA connection without due cause
also lends such claims a certain legitimacy. Certainly, the IRA has enough
enemies to ensure that some will use the current allegations as an opportunity
to inflict a serious public relations blow upon the Republican terrorists.
Against this must stand the powerful, if circumstantial, evidence against
the three Irishmen currently imprisoned in Columbia.
Looked at through a post-Sept. 11 prism, that the IRA would train such
terrorists in America’s back yard appears tantamount to a political,
and possibly military, suicide. However, the links currently being investigated
appear to have been established long before terrorist attacks on New York
and the Pentagon created a hostile strategic environment in which terrorist
groups now operate. Moreover, Sinn Fein has weathered the risk of damaging
it levels of support in the United States before, such as when Adams visited
Cuba last December. British intelligence claim that the IRA may have earned
as much as $2 million for training FARC, perhaps a conservative estimate
as the Columbian terrorist group’s annual income from illicit drugs
sales is estimated at $1 billion. Such financial incentive may have convinced
the IRA that training FARC was worth the risk, especially if reports from
Russia’s intelligence services that the Irish group has recently
purchased a shipment of the new AN-94 assault rifle prove true. Such armaments
do not come cheap, especially if undertaken while decommissioning selected
stockpiles of existing weapons. Moreover, the FARC-held region of Columbia
offers the IRA an unsurpassed training area to perfect its own weapons
and tactics. This is more vital than ever now that the political expediencies
of the Northern Ireland peace process effectively put the IRA's historical
training areas in the Irish Republic out of bounds. The risk of the Irish
authorities discovering that the IRA are engaged in terrorist training
while ostensibly observing a ceasefire outweigh the benefits of the organization's
engaging in such activities. Using Columbia as a testing ground carries
far less risk. It is also possible that the IRA may simply have become
overconfident that the support they enjoyed in America was something they
could depend on whatever the case may be. Sept. 11 may have changed that
forever.
From the U.S. point of view the IRA’s alleged training of FARC
is of immediate concern. Latin American narco-terrorists like FARC’s
are believed to be responsible for some 90 percent of the cocaine and
70 percent of the heroin sold in America. U.S. Southern Command has said
that it "recognized a viable terrorist threat in Latin America long
before Sept. 11," adding, "If not further exposed and removed,
that threat poses a serious potential risk to our own national security
as well as to our hemispheric neighbors." If the IRA, one of the
world’s most dangerous and successful terrorist groups, has indeed
trained FARC, that risk has multiplied exponentially. Charges that such
training has occurred must be investigated thoroughly and cannot be held
to ransom because of a peace process that will be put at far greater risk
by any failure to move against such cross-pollination among terrorists.
As such incidents show, the globalization of terrorism is larger than
al Qaeda.
Selected sources
Committee on International Realtions, U.S. House of Representatives,
"Summary of Investigation of IRA Links to FARC Narco-Terrorists in
Columbia," April 24 2002 http://www.house.gov/international_relations/findings.htm
Maj. Gen. Gary D. Speer, United States Army, Acting Commander in Chief,
United States Southern Command, "Posture Statement Before the 107th
Congress", 5 March 2002. http://www.defenselink.mil/dodgc/lrs/docs/test02-03-05Speer.rtf
Thomas Hunter, "Bomb School: International Terrorist Training Camps,"
Janes Intelligence Review, March 1997.
Various articles from: BBC Online; Daily Telegraph (UK); Washington Post;
and, Washington Times.
By Mark Burgess
CDI Research Analyst
mburgess@cdi.org
|